The Fourier Formalism
Contents
The Fourier Formalism¶
The Fourier formalism is described by Marsh et al 2022. Marsh et al. showed that, to leading order in \(g_{a\gamma}\), the conversion probability \(P_{\gamma_i\to a}\) (with \(i\in [x,y]\)) can be related to \(\Delta_i(z)\), or equivalently, the magnetic field profile along the line of sight \(B_i(z)\), using Fourier-like transforms. Although this treatment breaks down when the conversion probabilities exceed 5-10 per cent, it is an extremely useful framework when considering how different magnetic field treatments affect the conversion probability.
In this description, we will focus on a polarized beam using the \(x\)-component only. The unpolarised survival probability can always be obtained directly from
ALPro comes with routines for applying the Fourier formalism in the massless and massive regimes. More information can be found under Examples & Tutorials.
Massive ALPs¶
In the massive ALP (\(m_a \gg \omega_{\rm pl}\)) case and focusing on the $x$-component only, the conversion probability can be written as
where
and
denote the cosine and sine transforms using a conjugate variable \(\eta=m_a^2/2E\). By applying the Wiener Khinchin theorem, the conversion probability can also be expressed in terms of a cosine transform of the autocorrelation function of the line-of-sight magnetic field, \(c_{B_x}\), as
Massless ALPs¶
In the massless case (\(m_a \ll \omega_{\rm pl}\)), the same formalism applies if we transform to new variables. Specifically, \(\Delta_x\) is replaced by the function \(G=2 \Delta_x/\omega_{\rm pl}^2\), the line of sight distance coordinate is replaced by a phase factor proportional to the electron column density
and the conjugate Fourier variable is \(\lambda=1/E\). With these transformations, \(\Delta_x\) is replaced by the function \(G=2 \Delta_x/\omega_{\rm pl}\) with a coordinate change from \(z\) to a phase \(\varphi\), and a conjugate variable \(\lambda=1/E\). Nevertheless, the basic principle is similar to the massive ALP case, as the conversion probability can still be expressed as a simple transform of a function of the line of sight perpendicular magnetic field.